Sunday, February 3, 2013

WHY POKER PLAYERS ARE BETTER THAN YOUR HONOR STUDENT




            Imagine a subset of the real world designed to develop our nation’s youth and facilitate their becoming productive members of society; a place where young minds can gather to learn from others, exchange ideas, and develop practical skills; a place where tomorrow’s leaders gather to leverage our existing base of knowledge in order to propel society to greatness.  If the word “school” came to mind, I’m about to mindfuck you.
            Let me be more clear.  Most people think the best way to develop our youth is with “highly-trained” educators, classrooms, and books.  I say bullshit.  For one, it is widely known that our system of public education has some gaping holes: inability of standardized testing to validate intelligence, failure to appropriately motivate and reimburse teachers, inability to hold students accountable for poor performance, and inequality in resourcing within different socioeconomic backgrounds…among others.  Second, that inefficiency is costly.  Each year, we spend over $800 billion on knowledge that can be obtained in your underwear using Wikipedia and what do we have to show for it?  Beyond-irresponsible amounts of student debt and Occupy Wall Street.
            Don’t get me wrong.  There are certainly benefits to a structured educational system (particularly at lower levels where students need to understand basic intellectual concepts, as well as develop social skills); however – and this is important – THERE IS NO CAUSAL RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SYSTEMIC EDUCATION AND SUCCESS IN LIFE.  But what does it all mean, Basil?  Well, at the end of the day, we’re doing the next generation a disservice; we’re not adequately providing our students with the tools they need to be successful.  Do I have a better solution?  I thought you’d never ask.  Instead of wasting their time in high school and college classrooms, listening to modestly educated teachers spoon-feed information only 10% of which will be retained (see Ebbinghaus), students would be better off spending their time at poker table.
            Now, before you get your panties in a twist, poker is NOT gambling; it's a game of skill and the U.S. court system is slowly recognizing that.  If you're not going to come to terms with that, stop reading and drink the bleach under your sink.  Otherwise, below are four areas – necessary for real-world success – in which a group of poker players would outperform your honor student.


Critical thinking. One of the most important ways an individual contributes to society is through critical thinking; the ability to analyze and interpret information goes a long way toward expanding our knowledge of the world and challenging our perceptions of reality.  Despite the occasional Mr. Powell (my engaging and overqualified high school physics teacher), classroom instruction is largely focused around the recall and recognition of facts that the majority of students either A.) don’t care about or B.) will never use after the SAT.  Why does a retail salesperson or an office clerk (two of America’s most common jobs) need to understand the Pauli Exclusion Principle?  They don’t.  But what about higher-level learning and research, you ask?  Individuals destined or motivated enough to seek an advanced education will undoubtedly do so; they’ll be groomed by industry and/or academia to develop the 21st Century’s Theory of Relativity.  Not everyone needs to go to college…and I will expand on that topic later.
            On the contrary, the poker community fosters an environment where the ability to decipher complex mathematical, logical, and psychological situations is rewarded.  Although there are facts to be recalled (e.g. flushes are higher than straights), the majority of a player’s thinking takes place in the frontal lobe, not the hippocampus.  During a single poker hand, each player must identify, integrate, and interpret several situational factors that define the game’s non-linear outcomes.  For example, a poker hand begins with each player receiving two cards; before making the first decision (to play or not to play), good players will base their decision on the following factors:

-       Cards dealt
-       Number of players
-       Position relative to other players
-       Relative stack sizes
-       Outcomes of previous hands
-       What other players think of you
-       Action that has already occurred
-       Tells you may have picked up

That’s just one decision.  As the hand progresses, each decision becomes more complex as additional variables are introduced.  Each poker hand lasts approximately 2-3 minutes and, although it varies, an average poker session probably lasts for a few hours.  When was the last time your teacher gave you a task that demanding?
            In the end, participants are rewarded with a strengthening of the neural connections in their frontal lobes.  In school, all we’re doing is developing a bunch of overpriced monkeys to memorize facts and choose A, B, C, or D.  According to the U.S. Census Bureau, we spent $10,615 per student in 2010; here’s an idea: let’s take 10% of that money, give every high-school-aged student $1,000, and let them play some cards.  In the end, Americans might actually figure out HOW to use their brains, not just see WHAT’S in it.


Socialization. A common and legitimate argument for public schooling is to encourage the interaction and cooperation amongst peers.  The merits of socialization can be easily identified after observing any retard that’s been home-schooled.  The problem with social interaction in public schools is that – chances are – you were going to be friends with those people anyway (unless your pinko commie parents have something against street hockey); in addition, public schools cap the range of individuals with whom students can interact.  Have you ever been to a casino?  On any given night, I could find you a guy with a PhD in Astrophysics, a guy trying to steal my ATM pin, and everything in between.  Anyone trying to argue that an interaction with the “ATM pin thief” has no positive value is an idiot.  You may not want to interact with him as much as the astrophysicist, but both contribute toward our understanding of the human race.
So, why are these interactions important?  Well, as President Obama has so generously pointed out, “You didn’t build that.”  Exactly 0% of humans have contributed something to society that wasn’t – in some way, shape, or form – the byproduct of their interaction with another person.  In turn, the more people with which we interact, the more ideas, concepts, and beliefs we can leverage to enhance our society.  In addition, the more intelligent and successful individuals will tend to gravitate toward each other; this will propagate the most valuable ideas across an essentially unlimited network of social contacts (unlike high schools, which are localized and socioeconomically divided – poker players travel a lot).  But what about colleges????  I guarantee that every single time you sit down at a casino-run poker game, you will interact with someone new.  How many of you do that while you’re in line for a smoothie at the Student Union?  Who among you strikes up a convo with your neighbor in your 1,000,000 person lecture hall?
Furthermore, poker rooms don’t have a curriculum.  Now, you might be thinking, “Table talk is probably just random chit-chat.”  Sometimes...but a lot of the conversation is current event driven (poker room TV’s help, ldo).  Whether it’s sports, politics, crime, science, or economics, there will be a logical set of relevant topics for people to gravitate toward.  Finally, the impetus for this well-rounded and wide-spread socialization is described in the next paragraph: Social Darwinism.  This is how we ensure we don’t end up with poker tables full of like-minded cliques.  The profit has to flow from somewhere and it’s usually undesirable and more difficult to take money from people that act and think like you.     


            Social Darwinism. You know what we don’t have enough of?  Failure.  It is a necessary evolutionary principle; the slowest antelope gets eaten by the lion because it is the least valuable to the survival and prospering of its species.  For some reason, the human race – the smartest species to ever grace this planet (besides whatever built the Pyramids) – has forgotten that concept; we’re concerned with heat-winner ribbons and No Child Left Behind.  We ask questions like, “How can people shoot an innocent deer??”  Fuck the deer.  He tastes good and I’m hungry.  We’re slowly removing ourselves from the concept of natural selection; Ernst Mayr has some interesting thoughts on intelligence and evolution – look them up if you’re interested.
            Here’s the problem (and I alluded to this earlier): Not everyone is college material.  Teachers waste time on below average students under the delusion that it’s important for them to receive a higher education.  ORLY?  Did you watch the Occupy movement?  Let me sum it up for you:

“I’m Joe Student.  I spent the last four years skipping class, drinking, and having mediocre, short-lived sex and all I got was an overpriced liberal arts degree.  Now I can’t find a job and have an insane amount of debt that I’ll be paying off for the next 30 years.  I guess I’ll beg the federal government to help assuage my bad decisions.”

We’re grooming a society of mediocre, entitlement-driven hippies that don’t find out they’re worthless until they’ve placed an enormous social, financial, and political burden on this country.  Now, back to poker.  Poker will easily facilitate the success and demise of the appropriate classes of individuals – i.e. those who are smart and/or hard-working will find a way to be successful.  Say someone doesn’t like poker, there is a large population of people who find profit by investing in other successful poker players (“stakers”).  In turn, they have free time to pursue a hobby or job they actually enjoy, which undoubtedly provides a service to society, AND they’re debt free.  What about metal/wood working, agriculture, auto repair, and carpentry?  These are some of the skills that helped build our society and now their value is diluted by the costs of higher education (apprenticeship is a much more direct and efficient system).  Poker, like any other capitalist enterprise, will help reinforce the relationships between goods, services, supply, and demand; an environment in which the players have needs that can be fulfilled by the other players.  It’s a system in which participants cooperate amongst each other (if desired) to achieve both individual and collective success.
            So what about the bottom of the totem pole?  Those that choose not to participate or those who lack a practical level of competence will outcast themselves; they won’t make money, they won’t get girls, they won’t have friends and, hopefully, they won’t procreate.  As a wise Judge Smails once said, “Well, the world needs ditch diggers too.”  Ditch diggers, despite the connotation, actually do provide a valuable service.  If we look another standard deviation or so down the bell curve of societal potential, some people are going to be dead-beats and we can’t help that.  School, however, postpones this system, gives students a false sense of how the world works, and charges about $1,000/month for a good portion of your life.


Real-world skills.  As much as I appreciate the efforts of my dumbass, 8th grade Home-Ec teacher, if that’s the closest we can get to imparting real-world skills to our youth, we’re in trouble.  High school resembles the real world about as much as my dick resembles Ron Jeremy’s.  As a poker player, you are your own boss; there’s no one telling you where to be, when to be there, what to wear, what to do, and how to do it….it’s a facilitator.  If we thrust a 16 year old into a do-or-die situation, he’s going to figure out how to cook, clean, and do his laundry in between his video games and masturbation.  It’s a system that rewards time management, organization, financial responsibility, cost-benefit analysis, introspection, and cooperation.
But wait….doesn’t school foster these qualities?  Yes, it does.  The difference, however, is that poker reinforces the pleasure principle and motivates with something of greater relative value: money.  With money, you can do whatever you want…literally.  Here’s a brief list:

-       Start your own business
-       Buy a house
-       Pay someone to clean your house
-       Pay someone to grocery shop
-       Hookers and blow
-       Buy a car
-       Travel
-       Buy your girlfriend something nice

Unfortunately, you can’t do much with your A+.  Unless you’re able to translate that educational success into real-world achievement, you’re fucked.  With poker, you’re already in the “system.”  Don’t have connections or job prospects?  No problem…stay a while longer, enjoy yourself; it’s not like you have to file for unemployment (remember, you didn’t pay $40,000/year to play poker) or sacrifice your goals/desires/dreams to work for “the man” in order to make ends meet.  People spend 40 years working in some minimally satisfying job to make enough money to enjoy their 60s and 70s.  LOLWAT?  Urdoingitwrong.jpg.  Above all – and for lack of a better place to put it – poker allows you to spend more time with family and friends and doing the things you want to do; isn’t that what life’s all about?  If you don’t think so, enjoy your cubicle, asshole, I’m sure you’ll find it to be amazingly satisfying.


Now, back to my original contention (yeah, 3 pages ago); poker, like education, is an industry the foundation of which is a culmination of the critical tasks described above.  In the end, both systems will produce successes and failures; however, it is the average student with which we should be most concerned.  Unlike school, a poker game has the potential to turn a run-of-the-mill student into a societal gem.  So what’s the point?  Poker, despite its recent legislative gains, remains a highly regulated activity with a precarious reputation; while, on the other hand, schools are about as common as AIDS in Africa.  It’s time we start using a little more common sense when it comes to the future of our society.  It’s time we start thinking about what’s best for our children.  Besides, if we start getting rid of schools, we’d have a lot less school shootings….and who can argue with that?

1 comment: